Advanced

Windows vs. Linux vs. OS X: CIO John Halamka Tests Ubuntu

Posted by henke54 on · 3 comments
cio.com; By Meridith Levinson
Mail this story
Print this story

Last summer, CareGroup CIO John Halamka began looking for a viable alternative to the Microsoft Windows desktop operating system. After 16 years using Windows, he had enough of its instability and the countless updates that automatically installed themselves on his computer—often at inopportune times, like when he was in the middle of a presentation. As CIO of a health-care organization and affiliated medical school with 40,000 employees and 9 million patient records, Halamka has to be sure that the computers in the hospital, its administrative offices and medical school are secure, stable and easy to use.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Community, Linux, Microsoft, SUSE, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

> Standardization may one day become a relic of the corporate IT?s crusty past.

On the contrary! The more heterogeneous the computing environment, the more true standards compliance becomes absolutely vital.

Not the first to mix up 'vendor lock-in' with 'standards'.

Good article otherwise. BTW I replaced Evolution with sylpheed-claws-gtk and never looked back. True, it's not a PIM, but it's a fine mail client, with lots of handy plug-ins. (One of which actually adds PIM functionality :) And of course not Exchange-compatible, what I don't need, but somebody may.
I just can't figure out Evolution for some of my accounts. Sylpheed works better -- and way faster on my old crap hardware.

I read the whole article ... that CIO.com site thinks it's getting additional page views by splitting an article over 20 screens. It's getting them ... now, but all that clicking makes me not want to go there again.
I read his first article few months ago. I wasn't impressed.

A CIO that spends that much time evaluating is no good CIO to me. S/He either doesn't trust the capability and ability of the internal people to conduct the research and exploration, or s/he is a micro-manager (M&M) looking for more fame. Either way s/he is no good CIO with lots of free time.

I personally don't have much respects to CIOs in the first place. My baseline is, if a CIO doesn't have Linux partially implemented in his/her organization already, then s/he is not worth listening to.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post