Proprietary vs. OSS Software: The Debate Continues
|
|
|
Comments (7)
reverse engineering
UMMM .... one reverse engineers things that they do not have the source code for :D
If you have the source code, you can FORWARD engineer (also know as BUILD) it, no reverse engineering required :D
If you have the source code, you can FORWARD engineer (also know as BUILD) it, no reverse engineering required :D
And why reverse engineering is bad, by the way? Is it a synonym to "stealing"?
The writer does not seem to grasp that proprietary does not equate to secret or unknown to every one. It is only secret from those trying to obey the law. To those who don't care about the law this is merely a detail to be dealt with.
Security through obscurity does not work.
With OSS there is at least an opportunity to protect yourself.
Security through obscurity does not work.
With OSS there is at least an opportunity to protect yourself.
Debate?
What debate?
The one between proprietary software makers and F/OSS writers/users.
Proprietary: Hey! You have to pay us!
F/OSS: No.
It was a short debate, easy to miss.
Proprietary: Hey! You have to pay us!
F/OSS: No.
It was a short debate, easy to miss.
Ah, thanks, I get it now ;)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

When one gets the source code, one has to reverse engineer it to understand it, I guess :)