Advanced

Microsoft aims patent guns at Red Hat

Posted by hchaudh1 on · 7 comments
vnunet.com; By Tom Sanders
Mail this story
Print this story

"People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation to compensate us," Ballmer said last week at a company event in London discussing online services in the UK.

"The thing I worry about is that people will want to throw the baby out with the bath water and say: 'Let's just get rid of this.' That would be a terrible thing for innovation in companies large and small," he said.

Ballmer praised Novell at the UK event for valuing intellectual property, and suggested that open source vendors will be forced to strike similar deals with other patent holders.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Fedora, Linux, Microsoft, Novell

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

Ok, time to buy a full-page ad in the NYT or USA Today _demanding_ Microsoft stop libeling F/OSS and show the patents.

Obviously redhat stockholders are all ears on this. Steve opens his mouth and the stock goes up 4%. It's all bs Steve, show us your patents mate!
Bob, just buy a couple of shares of Microsoft stock and bring it up at the next shareholder's meeting. A demand that management either sue Red Hat or stop making lies about their fiscal standing seems to be in order. I'm sure the shareholders would be interested.
I've been reading comments on this article elsewhere that point out that Bombers statements could be construed as illegal under both American and English law. How about filing lawsuits against Bomber _personally_?

Wasn't there an article recently about one of the Linux organizations saying "put up or shut up"? They might like donations for just such a public spread... I hope I can find it.
Whatever is contemplated, it has to be very public, large scale, and in the mainstream media. Microsoft will shrug off a response that is restricted to the Linux media, or even the IT media. As the other correspondent said, it must be a NYT or Wall Street Journal or USA Today spread, must be on a David vs. Goliath theme, etc.

Having Linus rebut it on the kernel mailing list won't have any effect, nor an extensive rebuttal in Linux Journal. Ideally a lawsuit, if grounds exist, one that drags out a few years bleeding news stories the whole time, might do the trick.
A job for Helios? *g*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk

I would suggest blackmail, but as the above clip shows... Ballmer has no shame.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post