Advanced

Nigerian Patent Infringement Lawsuit: Scam or Shame?

Posted by Sander_Marechal on · 5 comments
OLPC News; By Christoph Derndorfer
Mail this story
Print this story

Now I'm not quite sure what to make of this at the moment but a United States-based Nigerian-owned company has sued OLPC for an alleged patent infringement about multilingual keyboard technology. As MarketWire.com puts it: "The patent infringement lawsuit was filed on November 22nd, 2007 as a result of OLPC's willful infringement of LANCOR's Nigeria Registered Design Patent # RD8489 and illegal reverse engineering of its keyboard driver source codes for use in the XO Laptops."

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: OLPC

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (5)

I emailed LANCOR - both the Nigerian and the US offices - and told them how pathetic I think this is. How can such a basic non-special concept even be patented? Not to mention that is has been done countless times before in some or other way. The ZX Spectrum keyboard for example, had a whole bunch of modifiers. The entire BASIC language's keywords were mapped onto the keys and typed in by using key combinations.

Anyhoo... I don't need to go on about how sad this is.
conspiracy theory thoughts.......... Wondering whether another internationally big company --- perhaps a partner of that big software company in the US Pacific Northwest ;) ? -- may have possibly "suggested" something to LANCOR??

So.... How do you enter a cokebottle with this LANCOR thingy? ;)
I wonder if the Nigerians ever heared of the Space Cadet keyboard. You can enter over 8000 different characters with it: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/S/space-cadet-keyboard....
vainrveenr: Wellll... I would not go so far as to cry MS Wolf 2007 (tm) just yet, even though their keyboard seems to implement some variation of Unicode that it proudly proclaims is implemented in Windows Vista. While their bread and butter seems to be Microsoft, it's probably not enough for them to blindly go and do Microsoft's bidding. Or maybe I am wrong... they don't seem to be entirely sane... I mean, who the heck sues a charity, and still expects it's public image to remain untarnished?

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post