Plone is not as good as Mambo
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| slippery Dec 23, 2004 11:24 AM EST |
I've installed Plone it is not as powerful nor as easy to administer as Mambo. Mambo also has a larger community with lots of third party components and modules. For a general purpose CMS, I don't think anything matches Mambo. There are special purpose systems, like Gallery, that are great for pictures, and some of the blog software is better if all you want is a blog, but for a complete system, stick with Mambo! |
| pigeonflight Dec 23, 2004 12:32 PM EST |
I see you've thoroughly explored both systems. How long did you spend on Plone? Have you ever extended the functionality of Mambo with custom code? |
| slippery Dec 23, 2004 1:33 PM EST |
I have not had the need to extend Mambo beyond the hundreds of available components and plugins. However, one client I do sysadmin work for had Mambo extended to integrate with the Lyris mailing manager. Additions/Deletions from either system update the other. Mambo has an API for doing a lot of system level stuff. I did not program that integration, but I see it working. I never tried to extend Plone. I really felt the architecture was overly complicated. To be fair, the version I used was about a year old, so it may be better now. |
| pigeonflight Dec 25, 2004 5:03 PM EST |
I think you may be very surprised by what Plone/Zope can do. Plone is extended using Products and scripts. To get an idea of what plone can do now.... look at http://www.contentmanagementsoftware.info Last I counted there were over 70 add on products... but I'm sure there are more now. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
