Perhaps the NYT and/or CNN reports were more objective
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| TxtEdMacs Feb 26, 2005 2:55 PM EST |
The stressed points I gathered from those sources was the dreaded letter "E" after the company's trading code. I hope most traders are more informed than I, because I got the impression that it was SCO that decided to change their code, albeit after getting the delisting notice. The ending sentences were the most telling: the March 17 hearing gave SCO at least four more weeks of trading to keep its valuation or even up to six months if a decision can be delayed. Once delisted the stocks lose liquidity and their values drops into the pennies range. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
