On MS
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| jdixon Mar 07, 2006 5:15 PM EST |
> I'd just use my funds to make all my products more secure, easier to use and more reliable.. This of course assumes that Microsoft is capable of making their software more secure and more reliable (easier to use I'll grant, they do that by taking all choice away from the user and making the decisions for them). I've seen no evidence that this is true since at least 1993. |
| hkwint Mar 10, 2006 2:50 AM EST |
The article is more from a 'shareholders point of view', while most articles about MS are from the technical point of view. Regularly, people tell about the brain drain at MS, so I think you are right. I think the Daniel Robbins case, and the case about them fighting over the Google-guy says a lot here. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
