Advanced

Wallace's OS

Story: Wallace v. FSF - Wallace Loses, Must Pay CostsTotal Replies: 0
Author Content
moopst

Mar 20, 2006
7:39 PM EST 		"prevents Plaintiff Daniel Wallace from marketing his own computer operating system as a competitor."

Daniel Wallace has an operating system? I would almost think he's a shill for Microsoft were it not for the total ineptness of his legal case. The SCO case has a lot of ineptness in it too, but at least it has managed to go on for a few years. But that too was basically over in the second year, when SCO lost it's other suit against Daimler-Chrysler.

If anything, the Sherman Anti-trust act would seem to apply to Microsoft.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post