My favorite part...

Story: IBM Throws its Active Support behind OpenOffice.org (at last)Total Replies: 4
Author Content
dinotrac

Sep 10, 2007
6:54 PM EDT
was this:

Quoting:Novell and Corel have versions of OpenOffice.org that support OOXML. Why don't you have similar support? Their versions have converters, which, at this point, don't yet do a flawless job translating between ODF and OOXML. In addition, IBM's customers haven't asked for this capability yet. ODF use dwarfs the use of OOXML.
wizz33

Sep 11, 2007
8:07 AM EDT
and in the comments. a lotus developer mentions the current 120 miljoen user base of lotus notes. :) ad those to the current Oo.org user base
Abe

Sep 11, 2007
8:26 AM EDT
Quoting:Novell and Corel have versions of OpenOffice.org that support OOXML. Why don't you have similar support?
You could ask similar but opposite question, Why should they? May be IBM doesn't think it is necessary or worth the effort for them. May be they are asking a similar question, why doesn't MS support ODF, which is already an ISO standard, without having to spend the extra efforts and resources to develop a converter.

Quoting:...which, at this point, don't yet do a flawless job translating between ODF and OOXML
I guess when you have this translator perfected and to a 100% conversion, then you can ask all these questions. Until then, don't bother because you have no point in asking them at this time.

dinotrac

Sep 11, 2007
8:29 AM EDT
>May be IBM doesn't think it is necessary or worth the effort for them.

Maybe that's exactly what you would have discovered if you had read the entire quote!
Abe

Sep 11, 2007
12:12 PM EDT
Quoting:Maybe that's exactly what you would have discovered if you had read the entire quote!
A little of elaboration doesn't hurt and might be helpful! :)

Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]

Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!