been there done that
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| herzeleid Nov 26, 2007 10:27 AM EST |
Indeed, some selected RDJ rulesets greatly enhance the effectiveness of out-of-the-box spamassassin. However, I stopped using RDJ a year ago, since sa-update does pretty much the same job, and is an integral part of spamassassin now. |
| hkwint Nov 26, 2007 10:49 AM EST |
If you worked with SA before, can you maybe answer the question while SA seems slow? I'm the only user on this system using it, Should I run it as a daemon instead of using the perl-modules? |
| herzeleid Nov 26, 2007 11:59 AM EST |
hkwint: How are you using it now? The way I've always run it is as a daemon on the smtp server, or to be more accurate, the spamassassin image is loaded into memory by amavis, and sits waiting for messages to scan. small messages typically pass through in a few milliseconds, large ones may take several seconds to scan. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
