This is good
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| theboomboomcars Mar 13, 2009 12:43 PM EDT |
but why did they release a new back end rather than improve the sane backend. I can understand making a new interface. Sane is a good stable backend for scanning, it is just lacking on some functionality on some scanners. Though since this is released under GPL the sane developers can use some of the code to add the missing functionality. Either way this is nice that there are getting to be more options for a scanner when my epson eventually dies. |
| Bob_Robertson Mar 13, 2009 7:41 PM EDT |
> but why did they release a new back end rather than improve the sane backend Not Invented Here. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
