Positives abound, yet...
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
vainrveenr Mar 18, 2009 9:35 PM EDT |
It might not even go through all the way. Much back-and-forth currently going on at this, e.g., within /. 's piece 'Sun In Talks To Be Acquired By IBM' at http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/18/1213209 and ZDNet's counterpoint piece 'IBM buying Sun Microsystems makes no sense, it's a red herring' at http://blogs.zdnet.com/Gardner/?p=2857 Seems ironic that almost two-and-a-half years ago, IBM itself was shooting down Sun Microsystems at LinuxWorld '06. From the piece 'IBM takes potshots at OpenSolaris' found at http://news.cnet.com/IBM-takes-potshots-at-OpenSolaris/2100-... Quoting:SAN FRANCISCO--OpenSolaris isn't a true open-source project, but rather a "facade," because Sun Microsystems doesn't share control of it with outsiders, executives from rival IBM say.Since IBM's LW '06 cutdown of Sun Microsystems here, CEO Schwartz has continued to tout the "corrective changes" he's been making, see http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/ Quite the irony indeed! |
Sander_Marechal Mar 19, 2009 4:53 AM EDT |
Yes, but turn it on it's head. IBM could do the right thing here and turn OpenSolaris (and OpenOffice.org which has the same problem) into true open source products. |
DarrenR114 Mar 19, 2009 1:50 PM EDT |
@Sander, OpenOffice.org IS a "true open source" product. |
Sander_Marechal Mar 19, 2009 6:14 PM EDT |
Yes and no. The same thing that is said about OpenSolaris is said about OpenOffice.org. Sun is keeping the reigns too tight. |
Scott_Ruecker Mar 19, 2009 6:53 PM EDT |
If OpenOffice.org was really 'open, it would be licensed under the GPL, period. If its not, then by 'true definition' it is not a 'true open source' project. |
caitlyn Mar 19, 2009 6:59 PM EDT |
@Scott: I disagree. OSI lists many licenses that meet the OSD other than the GPL. The GPL is one among many valid choices. |
tuxchick Mar 19, 2009 7:20 PM EDT |
Quoting: OpenSolaris isn't a true open-source project, but rather a "facade," because Sun Microsystems doesn't share control of it with outsiders, I've heard that criticism from volunteer devs who wanted to contribute, but were locked out. So it seems the moral is, even the freest license can be foiled by pesky human shenanigans. |
Scott_Ruecker Mar 19, 2009 7:42 PM EDT |
Ok Caitlyn, I will give you that. The OSI does recognize many different licenses as 'Open Source'. So I will change my statement to this: Is the source code freely distributable?, if it isn't, then its not a 'true open source' project. No open source code, no Open Source project. If I have a standard that is it. If I cannot get my grubby little hands on the source code, then its not 'true' Open Source. edit: I am not saying I am right, I am just saying that is my standard for what I consider "Open Source". |
tuxchick Mar 19, 2009 8:01 PM EDT |
wow scott, those are grubby hands... are you a coal miner? |
caitlyn Mar 19, 2009 8:44 PM EDT |
I basically agree with Scott's revised standard FWIW. Are grubby hands better than idle hands? |
Scott_Ruecker Mar 20, 2009 1:08 AM EDT |
So literal you are all of a sudden..oh wait..it not all of a sudden..I knew that..lol. And no, they are not grubby, they are strong and slightly callused from playing drums for 23 years.. I can't believe you two got me to talk about my hands..oh how you abuse me so..;-) |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!