Proof that Linux is insecure!!
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| tuxchick Aug 15, 2009 3:19 PM EDT |
Eight years of not patching this bug! Ha! Take that, dumb Linux hippies, here is proof that Windows security is better! signed, NotAShill NoReally |
| moopst Aug 15, 2009 10:55 PM EDT |
As long as the bug went undiscovered by the bad guys I'm OK with it. Oh, if it had been exploited by the bad guys it would have been found and fixed by the good guys pretty soon after the exploits emerged. |
| caitlyn Aug 15, 2009 10:57 PM EDT |
@moopst: You're making sense. Fearmongers don't use common sense. FUD is based on spreading fear regardless of the truth so I am very sure that the FUDsters and astroturfers will exploit this to the max. Some already are... |
| jdixon Aug 16, 2009 10:24 AM EDT |
> Some already are... Yeah. I love how Windows fanbois are always comparing the user exploits occasionally found on Linux to the remote exploits routinely found on Windows. But I guess expecting them to understand the difference is just asking too much. |
| gus3 Aug 16, 2009 1:59 PM EDT |
Three syllables: ActiveX. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
