Like most articles of Top 10 Linux lists...
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| caitlyn Aug 20, 2009 6:42 PM EDT |
Like most articles of Top 10 Linux lists this one is just the author's personal opinion with no metrics and no objective standards. It's absolutely useless. |
| softwarejanitor Aug 20, 2009 11:56 PM EDT |
@caitlyn The only metric that matters about "top 10 lists" is whether they are interesting or not. That usually depends on how eloquent the author is. Sadly, most fail that sort of litmus test. |
| caitlyn Aug 21, 2009 12:32 AM EDT |
Yes, you're right, since nobody could possibly test all the possible Linux distros out there. This article definitely falls into the not terribly eloquent or interesting category. It's not badly written but it utterly fails to make convincing arguments for any of the above. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
