DotNetNuke is Open Source for Windows anyway
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| tracyanne Sep 12, 2009 10:38 PM EDT |
I hesitate to call it Free Open Source, in spite of the License, as it depends heavily on Windows APIs, and I don't mean because it's written in a .NET language. Although the fact that it's VB.NET does tie it even more into a Windows dependency. There is already a Free Open Source fork of .Net Nuke, called PHP Nuke. I refer to Open Source projects that are heavily integrated into Windows APIs non Free, simply because of their dependence on Windows. |
| Sander_Marechal Sep 13, 2009 6:04 PM EDT |
It's the other way around. DotNetNuke is a fork of PHP Nuke which is much, much older than all of .Net. I wouldn't use either BTW. PHP Nuke (and most things derived from it) have one of the worst security track records in FOSS CMS land. |
| Bob_Robertson Sep 13, 2009 7:11 PM EDT |
Darn it, when I saw the title I thought Duke Nukem had been open sourced. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
