Advanced

Good article until the end

Story: Open source means freedom from 'anti-features'Total Replies: 8
Author Content
cabreh

Feb 09, 2010
7:01 AM EST 		This was a good factual reporting news item. Until they threw in the mandatory, proprietary software supporting rag last paragraph.

After all, we wouldn't want any non thinking, ComputerWorld reader getting the idea that open software might be worth looking into.

Same old FUD regurgitated again.
bigg

Feb 09, 2010
8:14 AM EST 		It's the mark of bad journalism, which explains why we see it so often. In order to "balance" the article, the "journalist" feels obligated to say something bad about the subject, whether or not it is relevant to the article.

"He worked his whole life helping the handicapped. He even sold his house and lived in a cardboard box so he could give them all of his salary. He volunteered at the hospital at least 40 hours every week. Some have accused him of putting a piece of gum under his desk in sixth grade."
Bob_Robertson

Feb 09, 2010
11:19 AM EST 		Good point, Bigg.

They spend so much time trying to hide "bias" that things become impossible. It is utterly unfair to try so hard to be "fair" that it ends up like all "politically correct" efforts, self defeating.

I like bias. I want my bias right up front where I can see it, where I can deal with it, and so I can make up my own mind.
tuxchick

Feb 09, 2010
11:35 AM EST 		There is much confusion about bias and fairness. Throwing in a token counterpoint at the end doesn't provide "balance", or anything useful at all. It's like serving a lemon as a counterpoint to chocolate cake. It serves no purpose, and it doesn't make the cake more fair and balanced.
gus3

Feb 09, 2010
12:03 PM EST
Quoting:I like bias. I want my bias right up front where I can see it, where I can deal with it, and so I can make up my own mind.
Case in point: Maureen O'Gara.
techiem2

Feb 09, 2010
12:46 PM EST 		I found the whole talking of open source in the article confusing. When I read the article (and especially the end) it sounded like he was saying that FOSS contains the same anti-features, but people will remove them on their machines by hacking the code.
tracyanne

Feb 09, 2010
3:50 PM EST
Quoting:... it sounded like he was saying that FOSS contains the same anti-features,..


That's what it looked like to me too.
Bob_Robertson

Feb 09, 2010
9:40 PM EST 		> it sounded like he was saying that FOSS contains the same anti-features

Maybe he was thinking of KDE4.
cabreh

Feb 10, 2010
2:58 AM EST 		My take on it was that open software _doesn't_ have this problem simply _because_ it can be (and maybe is?) so easily removed. I don't know of any instance where such a tactic was actually tried in a truely open source program.

I thought the article was very pro Open Source until that last paragraph.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post