Advanced

Should it be more?

Story: Linux kernel R&D worth over 1bn eurosTotal Replies: 6
Author Content
jezuch

Feb 25, 2010
5:53 AM EST 		I don't know what method they used (to lazy to bother to find out), but I hope they took into consideration that Linux is not a pile of code, but a constant stream of changesets, some of which take several attempts before they get merged and their development sometimes takes moths or even years. A lot of code gets changes time and time again. A a lot of code gets rejected, too, or even developed but never posted - and this code too would generate "R&D" costs (actually it's probably *the* cost of "R" in "R&D" - finding out what is feasible and what is not, and you can do that only by trying).

So I'd hazard a guess that the cost to develop Linux kernel is much more than even that.
Bob_Robertson

Feb 25, 2010
9:15 AM EST 		> So I'd hazard a guess that the cost to develop Linux kernel is much more than even that.

One heck of a lot more.

There is simply no way to replicate with just "money" the sheer QUANTITY of testing that every Linux kernel goes through with the simple expedient that every user has the capability of communicating directly to the developers when they find a problem.

I do not believe it would be possible to deliberately create what we call the Linux kernel.

Any OS deliberately created would be limited to the hardware that it was designed for. And I am not going to say that such a system would not be better than what we now call Linux _on_that_hardware_, but nothing that isn't "organically grown" could work as well on all the different hardware platforms, 16, 32, 64 bits, embedded, mainframe and virtualized, all that the same time.

(ok, I'm not certain that 16 bit Linux still exists)
dinotrac

Feb 25, 2010
9:41 AM EST 		Bob -

On 16 bit Linux -

Eazy Peazy.

Nothing that a LiveCD of a 32 bit distro and a good pair of tin snips won't handle.
TxtEdMacs

Feb 25, 2010
3:33 PM EST 		jez,

Thanks, problem solved.
Quoting: [...] Linux is not a pile of code, but [it ...] sometimes takes moths [... to] gets changes [into it]
Now I know how all the bugs got in. Probably put a leg across an open circuit frying it on the spot. Poor insects, to suffer so dearly for out mistakes.

YBT
jezuch

Feb 25, 2010
4:51 PM EST
Quoting:ok, I'm not certain that 16 bit Linux still exists


I don't think it ever existed... AFAIK Linux was from the get-go designed specially for Linus's 80386 box. Granted that Linus never thought that any other architecture would be suported, but going back to 16-bit from there must have seemed an extremely unattractive :)
jdixon

Feb 25, 2010
4:56 PM EST 		> I don't think it ever existed...

It was a work in progress at one time: http://elks.sourceforge.net/

But I'm not sure it ever reached a working state.
gus3

Feb 25, 2010
5:04 PM EST 		GeoWorks Ensemble supported virtual memory on my ancient Sanyo luggable XT with its 30M IDE HD.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post