Old "news"
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| ComputerBob Aug 02, 2011 8:19 AM EDT |
This story was already widely reported and discussed ad nauseum three days ago. |
| BernardSwiss Aug 02, 2011 4:41 PM EDT |
I somehow managed to miss it. Unfortunately, studies also show that people who rely on Fox News for their news are (measurably and demonstratively) more poorly informed and more misinformed than those who get their news elsewhere. Though the study was done by AptiQuant, not Fox News. I don't know anything about AptiQuant, but their conclusion accords with my biases -- so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, and chalk up the Fox News connection as an example of the Stopped Clock effect. |
| BernardSwiss Aug 02, 2011 4:45 PM EDT |
This also raises the interesting question: namely, will advertisers begin paying more for page views on FF, Opera, etc, and paying less for page views on IE -- or the other way around? |
| DrGeoffrey Aug 02, 2011 4:51 PM EDT |
Quoting:will advertisers begin paying more for page views on FF, Opera, etc, and paying less for page views on IE -- or the other way around? That depends upon the targeted market. It makes little sense to advertise a Maserati to people living(?) on $15,000/year. |
| jdixon Aug 02, 2011 7:20 PM EDT |
> Unfortunately, studies also show that people who rely on Fox News Well, it's hard to get a proper sample size for those who rely on MSNBC. |
| ComputerBob Aug 03, 2011 11:02 AM EDT |
Now it appears that this whole "non-story" was probably a hoax: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/191615/20110803/internet-exp... |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
