Untitled
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| gus3 Sep 30, 2011 6:49 PM EDT |
The entire article left a bad taste in my mouth, for two primary reasons: 1. The power consumption of a totally idle system borders on useless as a measurement. Only monitor systems with alarms are useful when totally idle; desktops, laptops, and netbooks, are simultaneously idle and useful only until the screen's contents are read. The whole purpose of a personal computer is to react to me when I press a key or move the mouse.(*) If I could type for four hours without charging, before a kernel update, but now after said update I can type for only 90 minutes before the red light comes on, then something has started consuming more power per keystroke, or generating more internal events. Eliminating the UI libraries as a culprit leaves two suspects: the application itself, and/or the kernel. 2. The tone of blaming the ignorant users for reporting their observations, reminds me of an episode not many years back, in which a prominent Desktop Environment's lead developers dismissed out-of-hand the lamentations of the unwashed masses. (*)I am purposely omitting media playback, which totally alters the base conditions of power use testing. |
| fewt Sep 30, 2011 7:17 PM EDT |
The interrupts of an idle system are important, they establish a baseline. You can't create a baseline of a system that is busy, unless you can completely re-create the scenario. Yes, I completely agree that a computer's job is to react when you provide input, but then the computer isn't idle. If a computer isn't idle, the CPU isn't in a sleep state. If it isn't in a sleep state, it's awake. The more things keeping it awake, the more wakeups powertop reports. There isn't any solid evidence that a computer's battery life has decreased after a kernel update, that's the problem. I'm running 3.0.3, and I still get 11 hours, just as I did with 2.6.35. My Sandy Bridge i5 Thinkpad that arrived today reports 6 hours with WIFI on. Of course, my distribution is tuned for battery life because that is important to me (and users of my distribution). As hard as it is to swallow, there is no problem, except PEBKAC. |
| gus3 Sep 30, 2011 7:29 PM EDT |
As an aside, the title of this thread was supposed to be: "you're doing it wrong" is not a solution |
| fewt Sep 30, 2011 7:39 PM EDT |
Quoting:"you're doing it wrong" is not a solution I agree, that's why I also instructed people how to properly test. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!