Untitled
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| feistyfeline May 27, 2012 10:13 PM EDT |
I think that the word irresponsible is rather strong. There are installer requirements,system requirements and there are user application program requirements. Reading down the source thread I see that people can install on sub 512MB memory systems. The reality is that people repurpose old computers, and there are humble brand new low memory systems out there. I suggest giving information to users and letting them decide. Fitness for purpose is a user issue. If there was a way the installer, or perhaps some software compatibility tool, could determine what in the computer is supported and give info how to get everything running then we'd all be in a better place. That information can then be useful to a package manager in contraindicating/suggesting individual apps like compositing. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
