Advanced

Sam Varghese redefines "Open Source" based on his own terms

Story: Android: not-so-open open source Total Replies: 1
Author Content
caitlyn

Jun 13, 2012
4:08 PM EDT 		I can download the Android source code for each and every release. That means it meets the Open Source definition. It's largely released under an Apache license and vendors can add (or not add) proprietary bits and pieces as they see fit. Those pieces are not FOSS but the underlying Android OS still is.

As Varghese himself points out (and then promptly ignores) at one time the FSF released code with source only available at the time of each release. There is nothing in the GPL or the Apache license to make every bit of development code that is not released open.

He complains that root is disabled on many Android devices. Doesn't Ubuntu try to lock up root as well? Does that mean Ubuntu, which Varghese often champions, isn't Open either? Hmmm...

It seems to me that Mr. Varghese found a new target and to heck with any facts that don't support his attack.
mbaehrlxer

Jun 14, 2012
11:34 AM EDT 		ubuntu does not lock up root. sudo is there and you do not need to jump through hoops or possibly void the waranty of your device to get root access.

greetings, eMBee.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post