Advanced

Bravo!

Story: Google Books ruled legal in massive win for fair use (updated)Total Replies: 5
Author Content
Bob_Robertson

Nov 15, 2013
11:34 AM EST 		The experience at Mises.org is that every time they convince some publisher to let them digitize and make a text available online gratis, sales of the dead-tree versions go up.

Digitizing makes these books searchable, which is a fantastic boon to researchers and people who want to find things.

Now it's generally obscure economics texts at Mises.org, yet the same basic argument is made by HBO, who does no advertising, and has found that the more vigorous the "illegal" sharing of their shows, the more subscribers they gain!
skelband

Nov 15, 2013
2:40 PM EST 		This is exactly what I was thinking when I read the article. Being able to do keyword searches on a library of written works makes it more likely that someone is going to find out about a book that they might wish to buy.

What Google want to do (as well as make lots of money of course) is make the texts searchable. Reading the texts in their entirety will not be possible. How can this be anything other than good for authors or publishers? It's "free" advertising and for a lot of works that may not be immediately accessible.

I really do wonder sometimes who the publisher organisations are working for. Or perhaps they are just embarrassed that Google are doing what the publishers should have done years ago?
Bob_Robertson

Nov 15, 2013
4:18 PM EST 		In my opinion, a text that is not "in print" should be public domain.
skelband

Nov 15, 2013
4:32 PM EST 		Agreed.
gus3

Nov 15, 2013
5:38 PM EST 		But only *after* it's been published...
BernardSwiss

Nov 15, 2013
6:43 PM EST
Quoting: I really do wonder sometimes who the publisher organizations are working for. Or perhaps they are just embarrassed that Google are doing what the publishers should have done years ago?


Well, it would appear that the majority of published authors don't feel that the "Authors Guild" represents them (at least not on matters pertaining to copyright). It's sort of like the similar music industry associations; there's a few high-profile supporters, but how well they actually represent the interests of the typical individual artists, rather than the large industry corporate concerns, is a matter of considerable debate.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post