In other news,...
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
JaseP Feb 16, 2014 1:34 PM EDT |
In other news, the team working on Upstart is rumored to downsized or reassigned (Just Kidding,... but maybe not)... |
tuxchick Feb 16, 2014 4:30 PM EDT |
lol. Well, one of the touted benefits of FOSS is less duplication of effort and code reuse! |
JaseP Feb 16, 2014 11:37 PM EDT |
Let's hope systemd gets some additional development... I'm skeptical it will be 100% ready (i.e.: security bugs, etc.) very soon... |
slacker_mike Feb 16, 2014 11:45 PM EDT |
I predict in the next 3 years Slackware will switch to systemd as well. Patrick will play it ultra conservative but I believe that the work to not adopt systemd will eventually outweigh the work to adopt systemd. Just my hunch. |
jdixon Feb 17, 2014 6:38 AM EDT |
> I predict in the next 3 years Slackware will switch to systemd as well. That sounds like about the right timeframe, yes. It'll take that long for it to stabilize enough for Patrick. |
vainrveenr Feb 17, 2014 12:37 PM EDT |
Quoting:I predict in the next 3 years Slackware will switch to systemd as well. Patrick will play it ultra conservative but I believe that the work to not adopt systemd will eventually outweigh the work to adopt systemd. Just my hunch. Indeed, according to the Debian 'Debate initsystem systemd' section Why Debian should default to systemd: Quoting:Fedora, OpenSuSE, Arch and Mageia have already made the choice to use systemd, and it is getting excellent upstream support for a growing number of packages.Further down in this same general section: Quoting:* Other distributions who switched to systemd were also confronted to a lot of controversy before the switch. After it became clear that rivers didn’t turn into blood, the complaints have only been sporadic. Perhaps Slackware's eventual switch to systemd will proceed in a much smoother fashion, following the experiences of Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, OpenSuSE, Arch and Mageia. Quoting:Let's hope systemd gets some additional development... I'm skeptical it will be 100% ready (i.e.: security bugs, etc.) very soon... This quote from the Debian 'Debate initsystem systemd' section Questions from the CTTE partially addresses the issue of "security bugs, etc.": Quoting:Ian: “A friend of mine mentioned to me in the pub that he had seem alarming reports of systemd security bugs.” A recommended source for reviewing the debate of which Init system to use for Debian -- sysvinit (status quo) versus systemd versus upstart -- is the Debian Wiki's very own 'Debate/initsystem', found at https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem |
Steven_Rosenber Feb 17, 2014 2:30 PM EDT |
What's interesting here is that factors going into the decision included technical merit and the Canonical CLA. Clearly the CLA worked against Upstart. It sure didn't work for it, as the only party the CLA benefits is Canonical. So whatever business plan the CLA was designed to support at Canonical now has to deal with a project (systemd) started in some part because of that CLA and adopted by the downstream distro (Debian) for that same reason. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!