As simple as possible, but not simpler.
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| Bob_Robertson Nov 25, 2014 8:57 AM EST |
"Future protocols shouldn't be more complex than necessary, and be designed so that they can be upgraded as time passes, ENISA says." Gee, where have I heard that before? Something like, "small tools that do one thing well and communicate through standard protocols"? |
| gus3 Nov 25, 2014 12:27 PM EST |
Actually, the first thing I thought of was "640K ought to be enough for anybody." |
| Bob_Robertson Nov 25, 2014 1:09 PM EST |
Gus, thanks for the chortle. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
