Advanced

Lots of misunderstanding going on

Story: Canonical Says Ubuntu-Based Docker Images Are Not a Copyright ViolationTotal Replies: 0
Author Content
albinard

Jul 30, 2015
12:31 PM EDT 		All the gripers seems to base their arguments on a misunderstanding of the issue, most often in a way that suits the griper's political/philosophical bias (sound familiar?).

It seems to me the issue can best be put in minimal form:

You can use, screw around with, and redistribute an Ubuntu Docker image however you want.

But when you redistribute the screwed-around-with image, call it your own image, not Canonical's.

Post a reply to this thread:

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post