And their statements about their intentions...
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| HiThere Sep 07, 2015 4:50 PM EDT |
The government has not been friendly to the rights of the citizenry recently, so a charitable interpretation of their intentions is compromised. In addition they particularly stated that a popular software package should not be installable. Manufacturers are likely to take that as implied instructions. After all, it would be expensive if they were to make a set of modifications intended to comply with the FCC ruling and the result was deemed non-compliant, so they are given a strong incentive to take a quite conservative view of what the instructions require. As such, I don't feel the "informal comment" about their intentions given at a press conference should be given much weight. What should be given weight is what they actually said to the manufacturers. And that appeared quite unfriendly to user modifications. If they want this to be understood differently, then they need to change their proposed ruling. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
