repost of an old article?
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| mbaehrlxer Oct 05, 2017 11:58 PM EDT |
the article date says oct 5th, 2017, but the comment section dates are all from two years ago. it is also surprising that there would be more than 3000 votes and many comments referencing each other within one day. it looks like someone changed the date to push the article to the top, which is fine if the content is still current, but with software, i'd like to see a review of which applications are still current or new. greetings, eMBee. |
| mbaehrlxer Oct 09, 2017 1:40 PM EDT |
well, it looks like the article has actually been somewhat updated. there are several new entries in the list at the bottom. i wish the author would have taken the opportunity to actually review some of the new entries too, instead of just recycling the old content. greetings, eMBee. |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
