Possibility of theft shouldn't dictate strategy.
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| chappaquachap May 17, 2004 8:42 PM EDT |
Cisco wrote the code, and so gets to write the license, and this includes keeping the code proprietary. Using possibility of theft to suggest that only an open source license is appropriate is a stretch, to say the least. File this story under "blame the victim". |
Post a reply to this thread:
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
