Showing headlines posted by schestowitz

a short and incomplete list of factors which I believe contribute to the sentiment that we can - and will - win the battles over hearts and minds in the "Tech" realm

Microsoft must be very pleased with what IBM is doing

it outsources coverage of the competition to "bullshit generators" operated by Microsoft (to cover Microsoft-related topics and Microsoft's competition).

Forget about projects that reject proprietary hosting?

These people speak for "Big Money" interests, not for freedom

'secure' boot isn't about security (it's about Microsoft being in control of physical computers irrespective of what operating system they run), and for merely having the audacity to point this out - as we've done for nearly 13 years already - you'd receive constant harassment and abuse by Microsofters

There are already numerous distros based on Devuan, even well known ones such as Peppermint (it's very popular).

They also misuse the term "backdoor" and try to imply that Linux itself has back doors.

The behviour of Canonical and Red Hat reminds us that community-led distros are important and we must not let companies like Canonical and Red Hat (or oligarchs like Mark Shuttleworth) become flag bearers

At the end of March of this year a Microsoft employee made a ton of noise about Xz when the real security blunder was an imminent (days away) report about Microsoft as a whole suffering a breach, impacting the US government and resulting in espionage (the US government then published a scathing report about why it was Microsoft's fault).

The promise or the commitment (IBM and OSI said they would continue OpenSource.com at OpenSource.net) hasn't lasted even a year (or just a little over a year).

It has often been said, and moreover articulated accurately, that software projects that refuse to collaborate (actively hostile towards outside contributions or contributions from the outside) are to be avoided

LLMs not only ruin the Web. They ruin the planet.

Freedom is not something you can legally pursue or accomplish when it is "too late", i.e. when everything is already proprietary or when you live under a dictatorship

To us, the Linux Foundation is just a massive scam. It calls itself "Linux", but only about 2% of its budget is devoted to Linux.

If Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) tactics and fear-mongering/dramatisation can determine election outcomes (FUD is spread fastest in social control media), it can also affect people's choice of operating systems and/or purchases

The bottom line is, most cheaters use Windows. EA is waging a war on technical people but instead of acknowledging the real issue it blames "Linux"

Linux Foundation is the new Outercurve (Microsoft), an infiltrated and undermined institution (they try to do the same to the FSF)

“The Linux Foundation provides a neutral, trusted home for developers to collaborate on open software projects” (yes, "open software").

I worked in several universities (about 4 different roles) and I kept seeing the 'Windowsheads' doing their damage, sometimes with "special guests" from Microsoft UK.