Advanced

Steve Jobs' Endangered Second Act

Posted by Andy_Updegrove on · 4 comments
ConsortiumInfo.org Standards Blog; By Andy Updegrove
Mail this story
Print this story

With the fantastic success of the iPod and iTunes, the successful launch of the tectonically innovative iPhone and the rejuvenation of Mac sales, Steve Jobs seems about to prove himself an exception to the rule that "There are no second acts in American lives." But will he in fact pull it off, leading Apple to dominate the mobile platform of the future after losing the PC to his rivals? Given yesterday's announcements of yesterday, I'm afraid not.

Yesterday, Jobs announced a new release of the iPhone operating system, and here is where I fear he may be making a fatal misstep. But first, the good news: Apple will embrace the innovation of independent software vendors (ISVs), providing them the technical information to create iPhone-based apps, and providing a ready distribution channel as well. But he also announced that they would have to pay up (30%) and that Apple would be the exlusive disbributor of their work.

So, it seems, Jobs may be about to replay the same mistakes of almost three decades ago. Will developers wish to tie themselves to the whims of Steve Jobs, the same way they did 25 years ago to Bill Gates - and pay a toll for the privilege of doing so to boot? Or will they spend their time working to support more open platforms, such as Android, where there will be less control, no toll booth, and multiple channels of distribution? Haven't they all been there before?

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

The PC won because it was an open hardware platform. Multiple vendors were able to create their PC-"Compatible" hardware and they all ran DOS. This drove down the price and up the performance. But it remained closed on the software side allowing Gates and Co to become gizillionaires.

Going closed on the hardware and toll road / DRM on the application software is as bad or worse than he did with the Apple's of the '80's. I don't recall paying a 30% tax on software I ran on my IIIc.
Steve Jobs should quite now while he's ahead. He thinks he knows better than other people what an innovative product is. I'm thinking about an idea that, if implemented, would blow the iPod out of the water!
There are lots of things that blow iLemming products out of the water. Simply put, it's the techno yuppie who is staying fashionable that Jobs & co targets so effectively. Heck my 4+ year old PDA does everything that an iphone will and more. The draw back with the PDA being as old as it is, I have to use VoIP for phone calls.
You can fool some of the people some of the time and thats good enough.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post