Henry Ford Would Have Hated Linux
Henry Ford, father of the mass production assembly line, would have hated Linux although embracing it today might help pull his company out of its current financial nosedive (Current stock price under $1.50 per share). Ford held 161 patents and if he were alive today, some of those might well be software-related--a very anti-Linux and anti-open source concept. |
|
|
Comments (18)
Shorter and "easier to digest", Hanse Hermann Hoppe's "Anti-intellectual Intellectuals":
http://mises.org/multimedia/mp3/25thNYC/15-Hoppe.mp3
and its transcription:
http://mises.org/Community/blogs/ayrnieu/archive/2008/07/15/...
For that matter, I really enjoy listening to Hoppe giving his lectures, lots of audio/video for anyone who wants it:
http://mises.org/media.aspx?action=showname&ID=164
And there is "The Anti-Capitalist Mentality", which Mr Hess displays in _spades_!
http://mises.org/etexts/mises/anticap.asp
As you say, R.A., even the basis of Hess' argument has nothing to do with free market forces. After all, if the business is already on the rocks, then the "free market" is doing its work to eliminate an inefficient firm.
Maybe the competition uses Linux, and will buy up the resources freed by this failure to make better uses of them. Bravo!
I think Henry Ford would have felt he had a lot in common with Linux and the FOSS industry.
Second, isn't it taken for granted that Ford was Nuts? I mean, he had the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" reprinted and spread around, I believe.
It just goes to show you, like William Gibson once said about the Beatles, the societal and technological window for becoming Ford Motor Company is not open for very long.
I don't get the Linux connection at all, that bit makes no sense to me.
Henry Ford was in the position Red Hat is now compared to Microsoft and Sun. Or the position Microsoft, Sun or Apple were compared to IBM, Burroughs or DEC a few decades ago.
Quoting:Most people were just wanting a car and didn't care that they were black although other colours were available in limited quantities, you just had to ask - most didn't. When the Model A came out in 1928, colour and trim packages were available, specific to the body style.
Do you have a source? I would like to look at it. In all of my reading of automotive history I have always come across people saying that the Model T was only offered in black and the Model A was released with color options because of customer demand. If this is just an urban legend that would be neat to find out.
I think it's sad how all of the really cool aspects of the early cars are now gone. The model T was much more than just a car, but not so much any more.
"From "The Ubiquitous Model T" by Les Henry, p. 45:
'It has often been stated that Ford maintained two production lines, one for the cars and one for the jokes, but this is apocryphal. However, the free advertising value of such jokes, actually promulgated them. He was more interested in their effect than in their veracity, of course; witness his own jest apropos color for Model T, "The customer may have any color he wants - as long as it is BLACK!" This the public heard and remembered, forgetting the colorful Fords of 1909-1913 and shrugging off those of 1926-1927. Then, in a final splash of color, and after an heroic essay at glamour, Model T was finally stricken from the Ford production schedule in June, 1927.'
Black was the only colour offered in 1914 and no mention was made of colour choices for the 1915-25 T's. In 1926, colours were again offered and maroon and green were added in 1927.
Edsel Ford realized that a new car was necessary - the public was clamouring for one and GM was surpassing Ford in sales - and fought his father to support its manufacture. After the dust settled, Henry Ford, aged 64, designed and built what was, for its time, a most advanced automobile. The Model A was offered in four colours in 1928. More colour packages became available in 1929 and quite a variety of colour packages were available for the1930 & 1931 models.
"Henry's Lady" by Ray Miller and a few books on the Model T are available from http://www.amazon.ca
http://img237.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tmp6506tb4.jpg My 1928 Ford Model A roadster, with rumble seat.
When designing his Model A, he wanted something that people could _fix_. So he told his engineers to come up with a simple carburetor. They came back with the most advanced and simple carburetor in the world, held together with only two bolts.
He sent it back, saying it was still too complex. After a while, they came back with it held together with only one bolt. That's the one that made it into the Model A.
It's too bad that such simplicity and clarity of design has been lost on the over-engineered, over-packaged, over-loaded automobiles on the market today. I miss my 1975 Saab, with its mechanical _everything_. The fuel injection was tuned by ear using a 3mm Allen wrench. I think the only diodes in the entire car were in the radio I added. That car was a tank, easily serviced anywhere I happened to be, and got better milage than my present car made 23 years later.
Damn, I feel old right now. I need an Ensure.
But yeah I know what you mean. While I was there we didn't push other services and had no warranty work done. About 90% of our business was return customers. Now I wont take my car there, shortly after I left the owners fired the Manager and now the store leads in warranty service with not nearly the volume of return customers. It's amazing what a little greed will do. I would rather have a store that sold less extra services and wasn't paying out for warranty work than to have a store that sold lots of extra services and was paying out thousands of dollars a month on warranty work. Then again I am not in business so what do I know?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

No, of course not. An already faltering company, which has been caught in the current downturn, cannot be saved by GNU/Linux. They are too late. A migration to GNU/Linux takes several months at least and costs serious money.
A switch is only viable if it doesn't drain essential resources and the company can wait a while for the benefits to materialize. If the balance sheet is dire, a migration project could plunge a company over the edge.
Darn, it's hard not to feed the trolls...