Advanced

Rambus Redux: The FTC Tries One Last Time (and so do I)

Posted by Andy_Updegrove on · 3 comments
ConsortiumInfo.org Standards Blog; By Andy Updegrove
Mail this story
Print this story

If you've ever wondered whether there is a SCO case for open standards, many people would say that the answer is "yes." And the stand in for SCO that they would pick is a company called Rambus incorporated.

Long time readers will recall that perhaps the most high-profile (and high emotion) legal dispute involving standards revolves around the conduct of a memory design company called Rambus Incorporated. The emotion arises in part because Rambus develops and licenses technology, but does not actually fabricate semiconductors. This has made its stockholders particularly partisan, as its stock has risen and fallen in synchrony with its fortunes in court, and its detractors particularly irate, because they view Rambus not only as a patent troll, but also as one that has gamed the standards development process during the creation of a universally adopted SDRAM memory standard. Hundreds of millions, and perhaps billions, of dollars of royalties are at stake.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is one of those that thinks that Rambus gamed the system and deceived the marketplace, and I'm another. That's why the FTC is asking the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court decision and reinstate the FTC's conviction of Rambus, and why I'm filing another in a series of "friend of the court" briefs in support of that goal.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: SCO; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

We sure could use 8 sticks of 512meg rdram! I have some DDRII notebook ram to trade!

The article? Well... I son't think that some of us will live to see the end of this.
hehe. Yeah, we have a full lab of Rambus machines at the college. They simply aren't worth upgrading the RAM in because it's so expensive.
One of our CADD workstations needed a Rambus upgrade. We spent a little bit more and bought a new workstation instead.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post