Cease and Desist: the netbook war of words
|
|
|
Comments (2)
Quoting:Anyone else on the coincidence of the timing of these C&D notices ??
Not me. That just sounds way too contrived. Besides that, the case is pretty clear cut.
(a) Does he have a trademark? Yes, probably. He would be stupid to go into this if he hadn't. (b) Is the trademark still valid, or has he lost the rights because he didn't step up sooner? That's for a judge to decide.
Also, this doesn't really have much to do with FOSS or open standards. I doubt PJ would have written about it much.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

The English-language 'Origin Intellectual Property Consulting Home Page' is http://www.origin.co.uk/home.htm and Origin CEO Peter Langley's profile is as follows: (from http://www.origin.co.uk/bios.htm#langley )
Obviously, a legal mind with immense experience.
One of Langley's last U.S. talks was "The new breed of Patent infringement Plaintiffs: are they a good thing? An economic perspective" given at the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Annual Meeting on Thursday 18th October 2007, and held at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel in Washington, DC. The Oxera paper of this talk, co-authored by David Bottomley, can be found in PDF-format at http://www.origin.co.uk/papers/Oxera.pdf . This paper and other writings at Origin's 'Briefing Papers, Books and Articles' ( http://www.origin.co.uk/papers.htm ) make fascinating legal reading on par with PJ Groklaw's continued analyses.
.... and speaking about Groklaw's PJ, it would almost seem to be an immensely fortuitous timing-opportunity for these particular C&D notices against "netbook"-using companies, given that legal IP-expert PJ is "obviously having a well deserved break" starting December 21st; exactly two days prior to the top-linked C&D notice (see 'A harvest of filings', http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081221184714164 )
Anyone else on the coincidence of the timing of these C&D notices ??