Intel Drops A Load Of G45 Programming Documentation
|
|
|
Comments (3)
....giggle.
*guffaw*
Laugh if you will, but this is just a sleazy assertion to besmirch the pristine surface reputation* of that august, commercial entity. Personally, I will not believe it until I see the film without FX thrown into the mix. Here is the level of proof I insist must exist before I will think ill of Intel: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7727136.stm [**].
* Actually losing this case, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_v._Intel , will more than suffice for me.
** Note too the value of the dumpings.
* Actually losing this case, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_v._Intel , will more than suffice for me.
** Note too the value of the dumpings.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
