- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
FOSS: How Did 2009 Shape Up?
|
|
Comments (4)
Chris Smart never claimed anything contrary to what you wrote and specifically mentioned the layoffs. Also, are you certain their was a 50/50 split in resources between openSUSE and SLE? I seriously doubt it and I'd like to see your source of information. Finally, Novell does contribute heavily to desktop development and has done since acquiring SUSE.
Maybe you should read the article before throwing stones claiming Chris somehow got things wrong.
Maybe you should read the article before throwing stones claiming Chris somehow got things wrong.
I am one of the former SUSE employees, and one of the guys who kicked ATIs butt and got it freed. I believe that i am quite aware of what suse did.
Tossing out 20% of the nuernberg developers severely reduced SUSEs ability to do anything upstream, so the booster team got created to cover up that fact.
Tossing out 20% of the nuernberg developers severely reduced SUSEs ability to do anything upstream, so the booster team got created to cover up that fact.
@libv
Thank you!
Thank you!
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
Maybe this linuxmag guy should do a bit more research.