CentOS remains way behind in tracking RHEL, Scientific Linux does better, but Debian and Ubuntu deserve consideration, too
|
|
|
Comments (7)
I don't run CentOS at the moment, but I know many of you do. I read that the project is way behind RHEL when it comes to releases, but how far behind is CentOS when it comes to applying security patches that the upstream RHEL has pushed to its paid users?
Their fac says 72 hours for security updates, longer for bug fixes.
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-cea9337e6513cc1567c4...
Here are the repository time stamps from the last two kernel updates:
Looks like Scientific Linux is beating Centos with security updates by nearly two weeks, but neither of them is getting close to a 72 hour standard.
RHEL: kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64 11/11/11 2:52:09 PM PST
SL: kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 22-Nov-2011 16:49
Ce: kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 07-Dec-2011 13:28
RHEL: kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64 9/29/11 12:26:44 PM PDT
SL: kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 06-Oct-2011 09:17
Ce: kernel-2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm 14-Oct-2011 17:34
Were these security updates or just normal updates?
I think the 72 Hrs is just for security.
Both of these kernel updates were classified by RedHat as security updates with a classification of "Important".
So now Steven has his answer. They say 72 Hours, but it's really 'whenever'.
Thanks @penguinist!
Thanks @penguinist!
Thank you for playing, everybody.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
