Advanced

Why The Linux Desktop Still Rocks

Posted by moabi on · 22 comments
LXer Linux News; By Alfred 'vector' Moabi
Mail this story
Print this story

LXer Feature: 20-Dec-2011

I needed that peace of mind that I never got with Windows, viruses always crashing my PC. I would have liked to get a Mac at some stage but the cost of it was a problem. Then I settled on Linux, and haven't looked back since.

For most of us in Africa, a feeling of owning a computer was always a fantasy. It seemed so far, and our wishes seemed impossible because Santa was a myth we only see in movies. The quick advancements in computing resulted in cheaper prices of computers, I got my first during my second year at the National University.

The feeling was captivating, I learned a few things and ultimately got to the point where I could install Window XP, but what about Linux? I did not hear of Linux until a year and half later and the worst part, I was misinformed about it. They said, "It is expensive and you cant get applications for Linux very easily", then about five years ago when I gave one of the Fedoras a try, it was weird but something I saw was worth exploring. Then I learned about Ubuntu and that is when the real exploration started.

I installed it without any audio or video, but I held on. I later got Real Player to work which allowed me to play some mp3s. That was one of my best days ever, doing something on my own without other people's intervention. From that day till now I have been distro hopping from one Ubuntu derivative to another and back. I can't believe I learned so much in so little time with such little resources.

Then a thought crossed my mind, "How about I install Ubuntu for few friends and see their reaction after few months". I did just that, and guess what? Most liked it and learned that regardless of what used to be4 said about Linux being unusable, it is. I set up their PCs to dual boot and one thing they all surprised me with was, that approximately 98% of them used the Ubuntu install more frequently that the Windows one (be it Win XP of 7). Some of them even showed me some tricks they learned on their own. They were very afraid of viruses and Linux finally gave them peace of mind.

At one stage, my hard disk got problems and I could not run Windows anymore. That was when I gave up using Windows on my PC. It was hard at first but I came to realize that it did me a great favour too. I am a programmer, though with little experience, and bash is indispensable, I wished for the same flexibility in Windows cmd, but was unfortunately out of luck.

I now have Qt Creator installed, Wingware IDE for Python, and IDLE too. Bluefish for HTML and CSS editing, codeblocks for C++, MySQL and PostgreSQL for my databases, and my tasks are even easier. Linux may look like it is for geeks, but with a fresh mind I think anybody can do it. Installation is easy with any Ubuntu based distro and after that, it boils down to what we call true exploration. I still install it from time to time for friends, and many have never looked back.

Some may say that the Linux Desktop is dead, but in my experience, in my country, the voyage is just beginning. Developers like me, code on Linux machines and mobile developers (symbian, android etc) use it too. All this makes me think, we don't need a big corporation to do it for us, we can do it ourselves, so "Can we develop for other operating systems and let our own die?" I don't think so! Yes, if you were talking about the mass adoption of Linux on the desktop, the may pace may be slow but surely we will get there.

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: LXer Features; Groups: Fedora, Linux, MySQL, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (22)

2 earlier comments in the full thread.

I'm old enough and went to a college on the leading edge of Unix adoption -- and bringing Unix to non-computer scientists -- in the 1980s, and I thought I'd never be able to run my own Unix machine.

It's crazy how things change.
I am a teacher and I have been installing Ubuntu for students and friends.

Yes, over time, they all boot into Ubuntu much more than Windows. For the students, the only times they really need Windows is to play 3D games or when they need to do an assignment using software (e.g. Photoimpact) to hand in assignments that require they use proprietary file formats that cannot be replicated in Linux.
Begs the question:

Why are you (plural) requiring assignments to be completed on proprietary software???
It's a sad affliction that affects far too many academics. They believe they are somehow preparing students for a specific career. Never mind the reality that not all firms use the same software, or that software must evolve or it is left behind (*knock* *knock* Hello? Microsoft?).

I actually had a respected academic in my field argue with firmly held belief that by teaching our students one specific application, said students can easily master other similar applications. . .

Regardless of whether there is any truth to his point, isn't the whole point of attending a university to LEARN?

Fortunately, this is one dinosaur who is retiring. Unfortunately, there are many Microsoft drones still to retire.
I went to college where I had to use Unix workstations. I never bought a DOS/Windows PC after seeing my roommate's PC and how horrible the video graphics and hybrid 8/16-bit DOS/Windows was compared to the unix workstations. And all he did with it was play games, which were worse than 8-bit computer games. By the time I was on my way to write a senior thesis, I had to fight for free spot at school workstations and I wished I had my own personal unix workstation. Then I heard about Linux, bought a PC, downloaded Slackware Linux on floppies, and installed it. Voila, I had X-windows server connecting through a modem to school workstations, my own latex packages, C compilers, database management, and all the personal applications I needed. It was such a liberating feeling that I had the raw unadulterated computing power at my fingertips like a unix workstation, without spending tens of thousands of dollars on hardware and software. And it was all free.
Free of viruses, free of spyware, free of proprietary control...
I have been using Open Source -- GNU/Linux, OpenShot, GIMP, LibreOffice, and many more -- since 2008 and I can't imagine my life without it. This article reminds me of my first days with Ubuntu... Ah, I'm getting nostalgic.
2001 here... after dabbling in 1999... My wife gives me cr@p about not using M$ office, but she's never used the latest, with the ribbon and all... She'd stop giving me grief if she ever had to use the ribbon ...
Still rocks? When did it stop? 'ix, in some form or another, has been on my desktop since the very early '90s.

I started drifting away from the Microsoft camp before Linux was available dual-booting DOS+Windows and Coherent on my '386. Yeah, it was a command line desktop but, heck, I was used to that since most of the VMS systems I used at work were all accessed through terminals. It was still a desktop with all the editors and development tools I could shake a stick at and email access via uucp. What more could one want. That later became a '486 still with DOS/Windows and Coherent but I later started running a commercial SVR4.2 (triple booting using the Coherent boot loader) as I wanted to start doing some X Windows programming and Coherent/X wasn't well tested at the time. I tried a very early version of Slackware on that '486 in the mid-90s (using the CD that came in "Linux Unleashed" or something like that) and liked what I saw though I wasn't real happy with the effort one had to make to get X up and running (without smoking one's monitor). When I saw online that Linux was working on SMP and things were looking stable, I began plotting to get a dual socket motherboard, finally taking the plunge and running Linux (Slackware) on a dual Pentium Pro board and recompiling the basic kernel to enable the (then experimental) SMP support. I haven't looked back since. (No, I'm not still using board.)

I stopped all my dual booting when Microsoft made it a hassle to add hardware to your system. Sorry Redmond but adding a SCSI controller to an already working system so I can add more disk drives does not make it a new system that should have to be approved by you. When the Windows OS that complained about the SCSI controller inevitably scribbled on itself and I couldn't locate the CD-ROM to try and repair it, I said goodbye to dual boot forever. (It was dual-booting SuSE by then.) I don't miss Windows one bit; it's too constraining.

For me, Linux made computing FUN again. Never let anyone tell it shouldn't be. Now when I run into a problem, I can fix it. Very satisfying. My wife's got a Windows laptop and when I hear her say something like "Uh, oh..." or "Why doesn't this work?" I know my blood pressure will have just shot up ten points because we probably won't be able to fix it without a trip to the vendor.
Quoting:My wife's got a Windows laptop and when I hear her say something like "Uh, oh..." or "Why doesn't this work?" I know my blood pressure will have just shot up ten points because we probably won't be able to fix it without a trip to the vendor.


My recommended solution (not that you have not thought of it): Free her and her laptop from MS's chains.

As I started my switch to Linux only about 5 years ago, I'm a relative newbie (see water behind ears). But since then I've moved my spouse and my son to Linux. True, there has been the occasional hassle. But the solution has been the same: Keep investigating distros, DEs, and packages until you find a combination that works well with their hardware and them.

MS can go to 'ell.
My first "personal" personal computer was back in [strike] 1999 [/strike] 1998 (Win '98, PII/Celeron 333MHz "Slot 1").

I had heard about Linux, and thought it might be cool to actually "learn about computers", so I went to some effort to get a system that would be Linux compatible. But then I found I kept quite busy enough exploring the web and fiddling with (ie. maintaining) Windows. Besides -- I was a little nervous about experimenting on my main (and [i]only[/]) computer. My boxed SuSE gathered dust on the shelf.

But Microsoft diligently made it clear that I didn't want to do business with a company like them, and also that I couldn't rely on them (or their product) and that they were liable to eventually force me to go elsewhere, so about a year later I had picked up a garage-sale clunker I wasn't afraid of breaking, and (as my boxed SuSE was both too heavy for it and out-dated) tried my hand at installing Debian. I didn't think it would be easy, but I figured setting up an [strike] escape route [/strike] migration plan was only prudent.

It turned out to be not as difficult as I had feared (Debian supplied a very comprehensive install guide and manual), and everything worked rather nicely. It wasn't long before I was dual-booting my "real" computer -- I actually liked using it better than using Windows, and I actually (measurably) got better performance, too. The reliability was a real plus, and I wasn't fiddling with AV, and security measures all the time, either. Eventually I discovered that I just wasn't booting into Windows at all, anymore, except to do maintenance (and maintaining Windows was much more work than running Linux).

I liked it so well I started pestering my bank and my public library about open standards compliance. The tech support for my bank was actually sympathetic and helpful, and some months later (without fanfare) they stopped gating access by browser (which had of course been justified from "higher up" by supposed "security issues"). I was so happy; I now both could, and dared to, bank on-line. Meanwhile, the Library Association is active on open formats and open standards issues. Today, the place where I bought my computer advises customers against banking on-line, for security reasons. Yes, the revolution continues, indeed.

Felt very nostalgic after reading the article. I installed PCQLinux in my PIII 733MHz pc back in 2001. The first thing that I immediately liked was it recognized all of my pc hardware. Unfortunately I messed up the sound card detection. But later on when I did a reinstall and played the first ever mp3 in that machine. I was feeling like in a blissful state. Even today the only reason I use windows is to play games and code in VS.
Sounds to me like the writer isn't comfortable using Linux as he said he disto hops all the time. If you are still distro hoping after a year or 2 then maybe Linux isn't for you. Ask yourself why are you distro hoping?

I distro hopped for months when I 1st started using it and it almost destroyed my wanting to use linux anymore, The more you hop the worse it gets and the harder the decision becomes on which one you are going to settle on and as soon as you see news of a distro release you are wiping your machine and installing it. I just wanted something which worked, something I could call home like I had done for 18 years previously with Windows, Something I didn't even need to think about. When your distro hoping you can't find that.
Quoting:If you are still distro hoping after a year or 2 then maybe Linux isn't for you.


Very valid point except, many of us have our favorite steady as she goes Distro and, at the same time, we keep testing the waters in other distros.

Personally, I started with Red Hat for few month until a friend of mine, a dentist (Yes a dentist) mentioned Suse, which I never heard of before. He happened to see Suse's packaged books and CD in a book store and needed some help. That is when I switched to Suse and stayed with it until Novel signed their famous deal with MS. It was the reason I switched to Kubuntu and still currently use it as my main Distro. During all these years since 1997, I tried all sorts of distros but they didn't capture my interest. It doesn't mean they weren't good, but rather most distros are close and pretty much do the same thing and pretty much the devil you know is better than the one you don't know.

I believe many tend to do the same just because FOSS keeps advancing at a very fast pace and we don't want to miss on any new thing. The reason we don't Distro hop much is because new good features brought by one Distro eventually get implemented in all others.



You get to the point where you don't want to set things up from scratch every five minutes, you find something that works, and you just want to get your work done. That's when the distro-hopping subsides.
Until the distro you choose makes changes that force you to reconsider your decision. Then the searching starts anew.
Hence, I use Slackware on my desktop and server, and I'm trying Bodhi on my netbook.
@fatriff, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swytubMA2uw just wondering.

Personally I've not done much in the way of distro hopping. I tried Lycoris, Red Hat and Mandrake back in 2000, settled on Mandrake, then after Mandriva (Mandrake) moved to KDE4 I looked around tried Ubuntu and it's derivatives and settled on Linux Mint. I can't at this moment think of any reason to try anything else, as Linux Mint is supporting continued development of MATE.
@DrGeoffrey;

That doesn't happen very often though. It's happened more frequently, as of late, but that's because of the Gnome Foundation thing. Mostly, once you find a favorite distro, that is pretty much it, for most users, anyway.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post