Fedora Is Still Unsure About ARM Support
|
|
|
Comments (4)
This shouldn't be a big surprise. Fedora is set up as a community precursor to RHEL which plays more in server space than on the desktop. Our group uses the Scientific Linux clone for servers or when someone needs a rock-solid it-will-never-break desktop machine. The rest of us use a mix of Fedora or Mint desktop machines because the interfaces are more up-to-date.
When we start to see ARM move into server space we will see Fedora move from secondary to primary support for ARM processors.
When we start to see ARM move into server space we will see Fedora move from secondary to primary support for ARM processors.
From what I can tell, they're basically saying "it's too hard, it's too slow, let Debian do it" ;)
After the brag-video about their porting it to the Raspberry Pi...?
@jezuch: That, or "The blobs are too closed!" I can understand that, but... Methinks at this point the Seneca/Fedora port effort will exert more pressure on that than mere whinging will, by pointing out where greater cooperation will lead to more "3: PROFIT!", meaning, more parts shipped.
@jezuch: That, or "The blobs are too closed!" I can understand that, but... Methinks at this point the Seneca/Fedora port effort will exert more pressure on that than mere whinging will, by pointing out where greater cooperation will lead to more "3: PROFIT!", meaning, more parts shipped.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

~Jeff