Advanced

Linux on the Desktop: New Opportunities

Posted by caitlyn on · 12 comments
The Linux Works; By Caitlyn Martin
Mail this story
Print this story

Lately we’ve been treated to (or bombarded by) a slew of articles and blog posts proclaiming the failure and/or the death of Linux on the desktop. I could describe what I really think of these articles but my language would be a bit more colorful than would be appropriate. Suffice it to say it’s all bunk as far as I am concerned.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Linux, SUSE

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (12)

The first comment just took my breath away. So much misinformation... Why do Windows fans feel so threatened by Linux that they have to run it down or dismiss it immediately, even on a blog that has no following yet?
I would have replied to that first poster, but It requires that I have an account to one or another ID service, and i can't use name and email, as many sites allow.
caitlyn Story submitter ·
@tracyanne: Yes, that's a change Google made some time after they took over Blogger/Blogspot. There's nothing I can do about that.
Ok, ta. Pitty though.
Err - I user blogger personally and have the option for people without accounts to post.

This user must not.

~Jeff
caitlyn Story submitter ·
It by "this user" you mean me, I'll just say the option is carefully hidden in the new Blogger. That used to be the default setting. I've just found where the option is and enabled anonymous comments. However, if I have some of the problems I've had in the past with trolls, hate posts and spammers I will disable it again and/or add comment moderation.
caitlyn Story submitter ·
It seems I can't go even one post or one day without having to turn on comment moderation. (sigh) Since someone felt it necessary to use strong language and engage in personal attacks on one of the people who commented everyone will have to wait for me to approve their comments. Sorry, but if people can't engage in a respectful conversation even if they disagree then I have no choice.
Comment moderation is good, anonymous/name and url is good.
caitlyn Story submitter ·
Well, everything you consider good is turned on now, tracyanne :)
> Comment moderation is good, anonymous/name and url is good.

While I don't consider comment moderation good, it is a necessary evil. The combination of spam and people who can't abide by the rules mean you really can't allow comments without it.

I'm conflicted about anonymous. As long as you allow a name/url and don't require it to be a real name, I don't think anonymous is necessary, but many people really like having the option.
Sometimes moderation for anonymous comments only works. If someone has an account, then you can warn them, ban them, etc. It's still too bad that comment moderation is necessary. By what I've seen, though, spam alone makes it a requirement.
I have to agree though with many of boh readers. The Blogger captcha is insanely hard to decipher at times. You might have to refresh it a dozen times or more to get a legible representation of what they want. I tried disabling moderation myself but had over 500 spam posts in 6 days. I can't handle that kind of trash.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post