Advanced

The State Of Linux Distributions Handling SecureBoot

Posted by bob on · 4 comments
Phoronix
Mail this story
Print this story

For those of you curious about the state of available Linux distributions that can handle UEFI SecureBoot on modern PCs certified for Microsoft Windows 8, here's a run-down of the most common Linux environments and their SecureBoot friendliness...

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Microsoft, Linux, Distributions; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

Quoting: Matthew also says that the Linux Foundation still hasn't received an officially signed copy of their boot-loader, for more on that see Linux Foundation Struggles With Microsoft UEFI Signing.


I mean, who could ever have even guessed that there might be any problems with that?

{/sarcasm}

Quoting:I mean, who could ever have even guessed that there might be any problems with that?


I believe it was Michele de Nostradamus. In Century 13, quatrain 13, he says:

Quoting:And it shall come to pass the 800 pound gorilla shall deny entrance to the penguin, when the grain shall be signed.


That should be easy enough to take care of, with a proper cast:

printf("The grain is %uld.n", (unsigned long) grain);
Quoting:I mean, who could ever have even guessed that there might be any problems with that?
Yeah, those of us who claimed Secure Boot was about vendor lock-in were called paranoid and fear mongers, remember. It was all FUD, they said. Uh huh... RMS called it "Restricted Boot" and in this case he was right on the mark.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post