Gnome Founder Miguel de Icaza Solves Identity Crisis, Moves To Mac
Today in his personal blog, Miguel de Icaza, founder of Gnome, and one of the most polarizing personalities in the free software world, announced that he is finished with the Linux platform –at least for personal use. Icaza has made a number of unpopular decisions over the years that have been rejected for the free software community at large, and has even been the target of serious criticism from the FSF and Richard Stallman, among others. |
|
|
Comments (8)
Quoting: I say it's been nice knowing you Miguel..
Or, "so long and thanks for Gnumeric," or...
http://i.imgur.com/CiXJjXc.gif
The desktop fiascos of the last few years have not helped. The "Linux is Ubuntu but Ubuntu has decided it doesn't care about being Linux" hasn't helped.
It's nice to have stuff that just works when you are trying to make a living.
Not only that, there's an awful lot more development tools for things like programming embedded systems on Linux. They have to boot into virtual machines to run Windows for some things whereas I just use open source equivalents on my Linux machine. I really think Linux is a top class system to run on your computer these days. KDE4 since mid 2010 has been really good and continues to get better and better.
Apple do make nice hardware I have to say, but they stink as an entity; if anyone made similar hardware with the same spec for the same price as my 17" Macbook Pro I would quite happily change. No-one does though.
Apple does stink as an entity, but try running Photoshop on your Linux box without virtualization. If you do ruby and rails development, as I do, Macs are the de facto standard.
I don't like it -- and I am always out of step -- but that's the way it is these days.
I'm certainly not a de Icaza fan, though I think pretty well of Gnumeric and Midnight Commander. He seems to love Microsoft and Apple both a lot more than I do. He also seems much more dissatisfied with Linux than I am (I am much more satisfied with Linux than with Windows or OS X). What I really haven't appreciated about Miguel, though, is his supposed advocacy for Linux and open source software, while all the while saying how much better Windows is and how great Bill Gates is. He seems to admire business success and profit a lot more than freedom, which is an odd thing for a supposed Free Software advocate. I have nothing against business success and profit, but at what cost? I don't believe in putting these things above principles, ethics, and morals.
On target, even-handed, and succinct! Bravo!
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
