Advanced

As interconnected devices abound, security risks grow

Posted by tracyanne on · 6 comments
LinuxGizmos.com
Mail this story
Print this story

Although security issues are familiar to most PC users, the potential for hacking and malware in embedded devices like ATMs, medical devices, and smart cars is less understood. In this guest column, VDC Research VP Chris Rommel presents evidence that consumers are starting to fret about the security risks posted by their increasingly interconnected lifestyles. [...]

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Embedded; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

A whole lot of nothing was said in this article. Basically, people fear the "interwebs" because there are more interconnected devices,... OK?!?! Are their fears well founded?! ... No details. Have there been well publicized examples?! No details. Nothing but a survey was referenced, essentially.

It's been my experience that the most secure devices have been the embedded devices, because the vast majority of them cannot be easily re-flashed with cracked/infected firmware... But that's just me... But it seems to me that if the approach is to continue to make it difficult to access the firmware,... that ought to be a good approach.
But would you use a wireless-accessible pacemaker?

IOW, bet your life? Literally?
JaseP wrote:It's been my experience that the most secure devices have been the embedded devices,


Define embedded devices.

A cell phone qualifies as an embedded device and they are wide open to security exploits. Recall all the whining and whimpering that went on for weeks after Mat Honan at Wired.com suffered his "epic hack" cuz all his "devices" were exploited and his life was destroyed. I figured it was all sensationalist horsecrap, but the fact remains. Too many embedded devices ARE accessible and too many ARE interconnected and "interwebs" should rightfully be feared or at least respected for what the really are, which is a means of access.
Honan's problem was not an embedded device,... His Google password had been hacked. He had failed to set up two step authentication, and his attackers were able to get into his other accounts from their links into to Google account.
"....hackers used it to remotely erase all of the data on my iPhone....."

*sigh* Argue with Mat about whether not he thought it was a "problem".

It was his account, not his phone that was compromised. I'm betting his phone's OS was 100% intact (meaning = no malware, no over-written OS code)... Apple account settings and their servers are where the rubber failed to meet the road, I'm betting... No amount of device security is going to help you once attackers have your account information.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post