Review: Fuduntu 2013.2
|
|
|
Comments (7)
Bit late, huh ?
Nope. The distro will continue, probably under another name, rebased to openSUSE.
I stand corrected. You have insider information that I don't have.
"The distro is basically the same. You know, except for the core it is built on, the name, and the people spear heading it's development."
Sounds like a new project to me...
RIP Fuduntu.
~Jeff
Sounds like a new project to me...
RIP Fuduntu.
~Jeff
This is one of those cases where they started based on Fedora, I believe. Once they went their own way, it looks like it became too hard to deal with all the plumbing that a big distro like Fedora or Debian takes care of for its downstream derivatives.
Jeff91: It's the same team minus Andrew Wyatt.
I'd still argue that changing names and distro bases means a new project caitlyn.
@Steven I completely understand that. I was surprised when they tried to do everything themselves.
There is a reason I rebase Bodhi on a new Ubuntu release every two years. It takes about that much time for it to start becoming difficult to backport things.
~Jeff
@Steven I completely understand that. I was surprised when they tried to do everything themselves.
There is a reason I rebase Bodhi on a new Ubuntu release every two years. It takes about that much time for it to start becoming difficult to backport things.
~Jeff
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
