What Makes a Community Distro?
|
|
|
Comments (4)
It's fascinating how all these commercial distributions want to be called a community distro.
Perhaps marketing in Linux is not dead.
Perhaps marketing in Linux is not dead.
@DrGeoffrrey,
>> It's fascinating how all these commercial distributions want to be called a community distro.
Seems to me that the worst of these here is the Canonical-M$'s flagship product, Baboontu. Remember all that brouhaha around March 9-10 of this year about the Canonical bigshots' notorious "Community-Avoidance" decisions(M$) and PR-spin(JBocan) ??!!
2c
>> It's fascinating how all these commercial distributions want to be called a community distro.
Seems to me that the worst of these here is the Canonical-M$'s flagship product, Baboontu. Remember all that brouhaha around March 9-10 of this year about the Canonical bigshots' notorious "Community-Avoidance" decisions(M$) and PR-spin(JBocan) ??!!
2c
@linux4567,
By that definition, wouldn't Linux MInt be a non0community distribution. It hires developers. So it's not completely run by a community of volunteers.
I think the expansion of Linux Mint and their decision to expand with paid developers was a very good thing.
By that definition, wouldn't Linux MInt be a non0community distribution. It hires developers. So it's not completely run by a community of volunteers.
I think the expansion of Linux Mint and their decision to expand with paid developers was a very good thing.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

A real community distro is run completely by a community of volunteers who do all the work and make all the decisions without influence from any commercial entity.