Advanced

Manjaro 0.8.5 review - Sacrifice the goats!

Posted by slacker_mike on · 2 comments
http://www.dedoimedo.com; By Igor Ljubuncic
Mail this story
Print this story

Well, well, well, I have never imagined I would be testing a distribution based on another distribution, which mandates that you sacrifice animals on a cold slab of red marble etched with runic symbols and C language just to get the networking running. But Manjaro is unto Arch what Sabayon is unto Gentoo. And so here we are.

I have received maybe half a million requests, all right, maybe three requests to review the distro, and they all promised I would not have to manually monkey my way around the system as if it's a paying job. With this in mind as strict rule no. 4, thou shalt not dabble in unnecessary stuff, I set about testing Manjaro 0.8.5, the almost latest version by the time you read this review. The drama takes place on a T61 box, with Intel graphics and SSD.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Reviews; Groups: Arch

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (2)

cmost ·
As I read this review I can't help but think this author is doing something wrong and doesn't know as much about Linux as he pretends to. I come with the unique perspective of being a long-time Sabayon user who recently tried Manjaro 0.85 in a virtual machine. Let's start with his pathetic Sabayon review which he referenced in the Manjaro review.

I have used Sabayon exclusively since 2010; in fact I only recently re-installed the system after rolling upgrades for three years. I have also installed Sabayon for several clients and friends who wanted something cutting edge that they'd wouldn't have to reinstall every six months. I have never encountered any of the problems this author claims he encountered and there's nothing wrong with Sabayon's Anaconda based installer. It's clean, simple and yet powerful enough to slice and dice any drive or setup any boot configuration with ease. Maybe he wasn't paying attention to the options. I have never had any trouble with GRUB whether other distros are installed or Windows. It always picks up the other OSs and creates menu entries automatically. Even UEFI works for the love of Pete. Once installed, Magneto and package management work perfectly either from the excellent GUI tools (Rigo or Sulfur) or from the command line using equo. Networking also worked flawlessly as did MP3 and flash. Check your hardware dude! Not only are connections to SAMBA servers fast and reliable but I actually use Sabayon as an enterprise class domain controller which services clients from a LAN, acts as a dlna server via Mediatomb and hosts multiple network printers for a bustling office. As for printers, come on! Griping about having to configure CUPS from its browser interface which is cleaner and fully featured versus any of the DE's graphical tools. And, for the record, the graphical DE printer admin tools are easily installed from the repos. Bellyache about nothing much? Finally, wake up and smell reality buddy. Why would anyone use the cumbersome Vi when we have nano and a host of GUI text editors that are FAR SIMPLER? Stop trying to pretend to be L33t.

As for the issues this author claims to have with Manjaro, I just never saw them. Both the graphical and command line package managers worked well and without issues. I never had a problem with repos or slow transfers. Multimedia played out of the box. Networking was fast and simple.

Before writing a diatribe that denigrates two very good distributions that take two Juggernaut uber geek distributions like Gentoo and Arch and place them into the hands of beginners in the form of Sabayon and Manjaro, check your hardware first to ensure it is fully Linux compliant. Also take a look at the distro's forums, release notes and installation guides to ensure you are aware of any issues from the get go.
Read the whole comment
Jeff91 ·
Its funny, I started reading your comment before I read the actual article, but I knew before I even finished your comment that it was written by the toolbox that is the person who writes Dedoimedo.com

The dude always does very little research before he writes his almost always poor reviews.

~Jeff

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post