Why are some in IT so resistant to change?
|
|
|
Comments (3)
You are right rnturn in that giving "unsecured toys" access to the corporate crown jewels is asking for trouble.
The win-win for this is to isolate a network for unsecured devices. Give them open access to the Internet and let them read their mail, but keep them isolated from sensitive company and customer data. Assume that many of these devices will be compromised and then proceed from that premise.
After all, 99% of tablet and smartphone users only care about Internet and email anyway. Most will be pleased with that level of access.
The win-win for this is to isolate a network for unsecured devices. Give them open access to the Internet and let them read their mail, but keep them isolated from sensitive company and customer data. Assume that many of these devices will be compromised and then proceed from that premise.
After all, 99% of tablet and smartphone users only care about Internet and email anyway. Most will be pleased with that level of access.
I tried to post a comment, but it wound up linked to the Brazil story instead. :(
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Read any online article about locking down user equipment and then skim through the comments. The "I've got a right to use my expensive toy on the company network" folks come out of the woodwork in force.