Advanced

More on Google’s Search Algorithm (does it favor Google+?)

Posted by Andy_Updegrove on · Post a comment
Tales of Adversego; By Andy Updegrove
Mail this story
Print this story

Can search results this high really have another explanation?

A week ago I wrote a piece here called Google Search Winners and Losers (and what does it mean for you?) The primary point I was making was that seeking to play SEO games (search engine optimization) with an author site was a waste of time, money and energy. While I supported the point with some Alexa charts for several book-oriented Web sites, that’s hardly empirical proof. Today, I happened to stumble on something that further supports that point, but and may indicate something even more intriguing.

Here’s what happened: on April 12 I posted a review here of a New Yorker piece by Ian Frazier, and in that review, I compared Frazier’s writing favorably to that of John McPhee. This morning, while replying to a comment someone posted to that blog entry, I needed to remember the name of one of McPhee’s books, and ran a Google search of “John McPhee.” The result? The third hit of the search – out of 9,260,000 hits – was my blog entry. Huh?

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post