- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Systemd – for better or worse
|
|
|
Comments (2)
Quoting: Unless these "developers" manage to sprout a actual AI that can mimic the behavior of Jeeves, the only "admins" that wants anything to do with systemd are those running devops for the web monkeys with their heads in the clouds...I think there's another place,... That is among admins who mind large server farms with fire-and-forget servers running on virtual machines sprouting up all over the place... I think that it is that set who are driving systemd development.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
Everything is developer this developer that, when the biggest groundswell of resistance are from sysadmins that want a reliable, predicable system. And systemd seems to be incapable of providing that, as it keep starting or stopping "units" left and right based on the interactions between them.
End result is things like trying to stop one thing and having something completely unrelated (at least on the surface) also stop.
That kind of behavior is what many a user left Windows over.
Unless these "developers" manage to sprout a actual AI that can mimic the behavior of Jeeves, the only "admins" that wants anything to do with systemd are those running devops for the web monkeys with their heads in the clouds...