Advanced

Cyanogen said to be hoovering up cash, but NOT from Microsoft

Posted by bob on · 5 comments
The Register; By Neil McAllister
Mail this story
Print this story

Redmond reportedly sitting out firmware firm's $110m funding round. Sources say Android alt-firmware outfit Cyanogen is close to closing a new round of funding, but Microsoft reportedly won't be among the investors.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Android, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (5)

I'm asking this as a question for anyone who may have information and or know better than I that maybe the reason MS isn't taking part in funding of the project is because Cyanogen, since it based on Android Open Source Project, perhaps doesn't use the same proprietary code responsible for android royalties to be paid to MS?
The MS software patents have nothing to do with proprietary or open source code in Android. What they have to do with is a claimed method of doing something in the (illegal, if the law was applied correctly) patent that they claim a particular device or another infringes on. MS's attempts and Android extortion are in order to offset the fact that they have been a bust in the the mobile market since Windows CE.

Open source doesn't act as a bar to any of their (fallacious) claims. The only reasons that they don't go after open source companies directly is that they run the risk of having their software patents invalidated, which would hurt the bottom line in their shakedown attempts. If MS went after an open source company directly (i.e.: Red Hat, IBM, or say,... Intel's open source efforts) they would circle the wagons, probably implicating others in the Open Invention Network (http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/) to bring their patents to bear, and it would be an all out patent Armageddon.

What MS wants is to "quietly" use their patents to shake down competing software efforts that OEMs may be using, in order to hedge the hemorrhaging they experience by failing to capture a given market (or to lose one). If they were to open up Pandora's box, by initiating an all out patent war, they would run the risk of A) having their particular patents being invalidated, and/or B) forcing either the courts or the legislature have to draw a fine line and put the nail in the coffin of software patents altogether. So,... They continue skirt around the issue, employ mafia shake down tactics, and go after relatively easy prey (companies that can't afford to fight them, or companies that can't afford not to do business with them).
Who can say that MS is not investing through a 3rd party?
@JaseP:

My understanding is that the Microsoft Android licenses are based on exFAT and FAT32 patents... or at least that seems to be the best guess by the 'experts', whomever 'they' may be.
Thanks JaseP, excellent clarification. Much appreciated.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post