Advanced

TripleO QuickStart KSM vs instack-virt-setup deploying RDO Newton HA Overcloud

Posted by dba477 on · 1 comment
http://dbaxps.blogspot.com/; By Boris Derzhavets 		Mail this story
Print this story

Posting below is supposed to demonstrate KSM implementation on QuickStart providing significant relief on 32 GB VIRTHOST vs quite the same deployment described in previous draft .

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Tutorial; Groups: Red Hat, Virtualization

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (1)

dba477 Story submitter ·
I 've just tested standard KSM&&KSMTUNED set up on CentOS 7.2 along with instack-virt-setup HA overcloud deployment Stack's virthost's .bashrc [stack@Server72Centos ~]$ cat .bashrc export NODE_DIST=centos7 export NODE_CPU=2 export NODE_MEM=6500 export NODE_COUNT=4 export UNDERCLOUD_NODE_CPU=2 export UNDERCLOUD_NODE_MEM=8000 export NODE_DISK=45 export UNDERCLOUD_NODE_DISK=35 export FS_TYPE=ext4 # User specific aliases and functions export LIBVIRT_DEFAULT_URI="qemu:///system"

So far I don't see any problems and feel some confusion. Official manuals related with instack-virt-setup keep this question without any references. Post has been updated as well.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post